135 Route 202/206, Suite 2
Bedminster, NJ 07921
Suite 2401
New York, NY 10036
Suite 1300
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Rick Ranieri navigates and defends complex environmental litigation claims for his clients. He represents cases across various state and federal courts, particularly those involving occupational exposure to hazardous substances like asbestos, benzene, silica, and lead.
In his environmental practice, Rick tackles a broad spectrum of issues, from genetically modified organisms to landfill contamination and hazardous spills. With his wealth of experience, Rick is sought after for his insights and guidance in navigating these complex legal challenges.
Furthermore, Rick represents a diverse range of clients, including self-insured entities, insurance companies, and third-party administrators, in matters encompassing general liability, construction, and product liability. He frequently engages with regulatory agencies on behalf of his clients and possesses extensive experience in alternative dispute resolution.
Rick holds national certification as a civil trial advocate, and he is also certified by the New Jersey Supreme Court as a civil trial attorney.*
He has an AV® peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell. In 2013, Rick was listed as one of Philadelphia’s Top Rated Lawyers by American Lawyer Media and Martindale-Hubbell™. Rick was included in the New Jersey edition of Super Lawyers in the area of defense civil litigation numerous times since 2016.
*This certification is not granted by any governmental authority within the State of New York.
Secured summary judgment on behalf of a large east coast convenience store chain on the issue of lack of notice of black ice in a parking lot. The plaintiff claimed she fell on black ice in a parking lot and sustained severe spinal injuries, requiring surgery. The Court agreed with the defendant that there was no evidence that it had notice of the black ice and granted summary judgment and dismissed the case.
Successfully obtained dismissal of a serious injury/serious disability case on early Summary Judgment Motion in New Jersey State Court, in a case involving an issue of legal “first impression” in the state. An employee of our client fell off a building under construction and received workers’ compensation benefits for the injuries. The worker sued the general contractor for negligence and OSHA violations, but did not bring an employer liability claim against our client/subcontractor employer. The general contractor brought a third-party complaint alleging indirect employer liability, arguing workers’ compensation immunity did not bar indirect claims for “intentional” claims (OSHA violations, etc.). Summary Judgment was affirmed on appeal.
Successfully argued through all appellate levels including NJ Supreme Court case involving massive injuries and disabilities in mixed dram shop and motor vehicle case, where issue of statutory construction for lawsuit immunity statutes (bar to claims) in nature of statute of repose, was decided.
Successfully argued through all levels of appellate court including successfully at the New Jersey Supreme Court, occupational toxic exposure case where worker sued employer, despite worker receiving workers compensation benefits, under dual recovery theory allowed for “reckless indifference” theories, for rectal cancer allegedly due to exposure to solvents and heavy metals.
On behalf of sole “deep pocket” private defendant, successfully argued before NJ Superior
Court causing change in law for municipal liability for related conditions of public property, causing multiple public entities let out initially on Summary Judgment to be brought back in, case involving multiple fatalities and multiple disabling and disfiguring injuries to minor and additional plaintiffs.
Successfully argued appeal that changed New Jersey Law, on Dram Shop foreseeability issues, in case involving a minor death and multiple, substantial, disfiguring and disabling injuries to multiple minors.
Voss v. Tranquillo, A-110-09 (N.J. 2011)
Duckett v. Wawa, Inc., 3405 EDA 2009 (PA App. Ct. 2011)
Krzyzanski v. Swepco Tube, A006309-06T5 (N.J. App. Div. 2008)
Civalier v. Estate of Trancucci, 648 A.2d 705 (N.J. 1994)
Thomson v. Victor’s Liquore Store, Inc., 523 A.2d 269 (N.J. App. Div. 1987)
Prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter that we or any lawyer may be retained to handle.
View Award Methodologies. No aspect of this advertising has been approved by the Supreme Court.