Scott Wilson

Partner
Mt. Laurel
2000 Midlantic Drive
Suite 200
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Scott Wilson primarily focuses on defending employers, insurance carriers, and self-insured entities in New Jersey workers’ compensation matters. With over 20 years of experience, Scott has successfully tried hundreds of cases to conclusion consistently delivering favorable results to his clients. He also handles complex Second Injury Fund claims.

Scott’s clients include hospitals, healthcare facilities, retail establishments, delivery services, and supermarkets. He collaborates closely with his clients to develop comprehensive strategies aimed at reducing exposure risk and effectively managing catastrophic workers’ compensation matters.

After completing law school, Scott gained valuable experience as a clerk for the Honorable Raymond Drozdowski, J.S.C., Camden County, laying a strong foundation for his career in workers’ compensation defense.

Professional & Community Involvement

  • Camden Country Bar Association
  • New Jersey State Bar Association
  • Burlington County Chamber of Commerce
  • Interfaith Caregivers

Speaking Engagements

  • 03.29.22 Understanding the Coming and Going Defense in NJ Workers’ Compensation Webinar
  • 05.27.21 New Jersey Marijuana Legalization and its Impact on the Workplace
  • 08.17.20 New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Update – Part 2
  • 02.20.18 Update on Medical Marijuana and the Opioid Crisis

Cases and Experience

Successfully defended an occupational cardiac stress claim. The employee produced three medical experts to support the allegation that his stressful work environment caused him to suffer a heart attack.  On cross-examination, each of the medical witnesses admitted the employee’s work-related stress was similar in character to many other occupations.  After the matter was tried to conclusion, the Judge ruled the employee failed to meet his burden as he did not show the stress was peculiar to his work. 

Obtained a dismissal after trial on the basis that the worker was not an employee.  The worker performed intermittent jobs at a church over a period of five years. The worker and two lay witnesses admitted on cross-examination that the church did not provide equipment or supervision while the work was being performed.  The Court held in favor of the respondent finding that the worker was an independent contractor.

Prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter that we or any lawyer may be retained to handle.

News & Presentations

10.16.25 | WG Alerts & Insights, Podcasts | Workers’ Compensation | Retail, Restaurants & Hospitality
01.22.25 | Firm News, WG Alerts & Insights, DEI

Assistant

Education

  • Rutgers University School of Law, J.D., 1997
  • Loyola University, B.A., 1992

Practices

Admissions

  • Pennsylvania
  • New Jersey

Industries

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby, LLP
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. Read our complete Privacy Policy.