Alan Arsenis defends a wide range of clients in workers’ compensation claims in New Jersey, including multinational transportation firms, premium casinos, construction companies, third-party administrators, self-insured entities, and governments.
Alan provides a balanced mix of strategic prevention and litigation skill, drawing on his three decades of experience to advise clients on risk management strategies to reduce exposure and prevent litigation. However, when disputes escalate, Alan has delivered successful outcomes in numerous trials before New Jersey judges, state courts, agencies, and appellate panels, including in Second Injury Fund cases.
In his practice, Alan has handled motions for medical treatment and temporary disability benefits, along with Section 20 cases. He is adept at defending clients against a broad spectrum of claims, including those related to physical injuries, stress, and mental health issues.
Alan has received a Martindale-Hubbell DistinguishedSM rating, reflecting his respected status among peers and his commitment to maintaining high legal and ethical standards.
- 06.08.23 The Risk Roundtable: The Ins and Outs of Medical Treatment in New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Claims
- 03.29.22 Understanding the Coming and Going Defense in NJ Workers’ Compensation Webinar
- 12.16.19 Workers’ Compensation Academy: The Ins and Outs of Medical Treatment in New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Claims
- 12.26.17 Top Ten New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Cases of 2017
- 06.21.17 Valuing the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Case for Settlement
- 08.19.16 MMI; Cutting Off Temp; Curative versus Palliative Treatment
- 10.23.15 Presenter, “Delaware Workers’ Compensation Law,” Amtrust, Princeton, NJ
Cases and Experience
Successfully defended against a work-related psychiatric/stress claim that was supported by objective evidence and confirmed to be related by our defense expert. The case involved a significant amount of unauthorized medical treatment and lost wages, a lien from the state Temporary Disability Benefits (TDB), and anticipated future medical treatments. Alan persuasively argued to the opposing counsel that the claimant, who had a prior psychiatric disability and a longstanding career in the medical field, would likely be viewed unfavorably. This argument led to the case being settled through a Section 20 agreement, effectively closing the matter.
Prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter that we or any lawyer may be retained to handle.
News & Presentations
06.30.23 | Firm News, Press Releases
06.08.23 | Podcasts
| Workers’ Compensation
03.29.22 | Webinars & Events
| Workers’ Compensation
Understanding the Coming and Going Defense in NJ Workers’ Compensation Webinar
01.25.22 | Firm News, Press Releases
01.25.21 | Firm News, Press Releases
