Healthcare

Healthcare providers, hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities face multifaceted risks in patient care. At Weber Gallagher, our attorneys are adept at managing these complexities, ensuring compliance with regulations and professional standards.

We defend against claims, including malpractice, wrongful death, survivor actions, product liability, and insurance cases. Our clients range from academic centers and health systems to individual practitioners and insurance companies.

Our team, with a deep understanding of the healthcare sector and many former providers, offers tailored advice. We cover a broad spectrum of healthcare entities with particular experience in areas like sub-acute and skilled nursing, rehabilitation, long-term care, and healthcare management.

We provide a comprehensive legal service, handling litigation, workers’ compensation, and employment law, focusing on proactive risk management to prevent legal issues. Our training and guidance aim to mitigate litigation risks, emphasizing documentation, policy development, and employee education to enhance care standards and compliance.

Experienced in defending long-term and acute care facilities, our practice addresses a variety of claims, including those related to ulcers, falls, mental status changes, abuse, neglect, nutritional problems, and medication errors. We support clients in quality control, compliance, and risk management, preparing them thoroughly for litigation, from document handling to expert witness coordination. We also navigate licensure issues and seek favorable outcomes through alternative dispute resolution.

Our successful litigation history spans state and federal laws, privacy regulations, and various judicial forums, highlighting our capability in health information privacy, including HIPAA and HITECH, and internal investigations.

Industry Leaders

Medical Malpractice Co-Managing Partner
Medical Malpractice Co-Managing Partner
Scott W. Bermack

Scott W. Bermack

Board of Directors & General Liability Co-Managing Partner
Eugene P. Feeney

Eugene P. Feeney

Medical Malpractice Co-Managing Partner
Paul M. Fires

Paul M. Fires

Firm Chair Emeritus & Workers’ Compensation Co-Managing Partner
Paula A. Koczan

Paula A. Koczan

Medical Malpractice Co-Managing Partner
Jennifer G. Laver

Jennifer G. Laver

Vice Managing Partner of the New Jersey Workers' Compensation Practice
Jeffrey D. Newby

Jeffrey D. Newby

Board of Directors & Workers' Compensation Co-Managing Partner
Tracy A. Walsh

Tracy A. Walsh

Board of Directors & Employment Managing Partner
11.20.25 | WG Alerts & Insights | Medical Malpractice | Healthcare
10.10.25 | WG Alerts & Insights | Workers’ Compensation | Healthcare
09.30.25 | WG Alerts & Insights | Medical Malpractice | Healthcare

Defended medical negligence action where the defendant physician was alleged to have been negligent in failing to properly diagnose and treat a woman’s post- surgical infection, which followed a bilateral breast augmentation and tummy tuck procedure. As a result of infection, both breast implants were removed and the abdominal incision opened and allowed to heal by secondary intention.

Defended a wrongful death and survival action arising from the care and treatment which the defendant physician provided to decedent, following admission to the hospital for what was diagnosed as pneumonia and possible CHF. After a five day admission, the patient was discharged. Within hours of his arrival at home, he experienced cardiac arrest. Despite appropriate resuscitation he could not be revived. A subsequently performed autopsy revealed the cause of death to be sudden cardiac death.

Defended medical negligence action arising from a doctor’s treatment of a woman’s right forearm, slightly displaced inter-articular distal avulsion fracture. The doctor’s treatment included a closed reduction and pinning of the right distal radial fracture. Post-operatively, the pin backed out and the fracture collapsed down and shortened. The patient was subsequently seen by another surgeon who repaired her right wrist deformity. The first doctor was alleged to have been negligent in performing the surgery without adequate fixation to prevent a collapse of the fracture.

Defended medical negligence action arising from an inguinal hernia repair and re-do inguinal hernia repair which was performed on minor-plaintiff, initially in 2005 and for a second time in 2006. Several months following the second surgical procedure, it was determined that minor plaintiff’s right testicle had infarcted. The defendant physician was alleged to have been negligent in failing to observe the blood supply to minor plaintiff’s right testicle during the surgery, and in failing to diagnose insufficient blood supply to the testicle post-operatively and timely address the same.

Defended a wrongful death and survival action arising from the stillborn death of the plaintiffs’ daughter. Her mother had been a patient of the defendant physician for several pregnancies. During the pregnancy in question, Mom, who had a history of seizure disorder, experienced seizures. Laboratory tests ruled out preeclampsia. She was seen in the defendant’s office where she underwent a non-stress test which was reassuring. After experiencing increasing seizure activity, she was readmitted to the hospital at which time the baby was monitored and was noted to be in good condition. The defendant physician saw her prior to discharge and recommended follow up with neurology. Four days later, she presented to the office with reports of inability to feel fetal movement. An ultrasound revealed a fetal death.

This wrongful death and survival action arises from the stillborn death of the plaintiffs’ daughter. Her mother had been a patient of the defendant physician for several pregnancies. During the pregnancy in question, Mom, who had a history of seizure disorder, experienced seizures. Laboratory tests ruled out preeclampsia. She was seen in the defendant’s office where she underwent a non-stress test which was reassuring. After experiencing increasing seizure activity, she was readmitted to the hospital at which time the baby was monitored and was noted to be in good condition. The defendant physician saw her prior to discharge and recommended follow up with neurology. Four days later, she presented to the office with reports of inability to feel fetal movement. An ultrasound revealed a fetal death. This case was tried in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in September 2011 and resulted in a defense verdict for the doctor.

Secured summary judgment for two physicians and a physician’s practice group in a wrongful death, medical malpractice case by presenting an argument that physician’s actions, while allegedly below the standard of care, were outside of the factual chain of causation. Summary Judgment was granted despite the presence of expert reports against the clients.

Successfully represented a medical facility where the petitioner filed a dependency claim alleging that the decedent died from alleged occupational exposure to radiation and other deleterious substances which eventually caused a brain tumor. Upon investigation with the client, it was determined that the decedent’s radiation exposure was well below the NJDEP guidelines. The matter was resolved for a minimal Section 20 settlement. 

Successfully retried a case remanded by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania involving the Mental Health Procedures Act by representing a Psychiatrist performing a Psychiatric Evaluation on a patient with mental health disorders during his admission to a drug detoxification and rehabilitation facility. The lawsuit filed alleges that the "cocktail" of medications prescribed for detoxification created a lethal combination for the plaintiff and that a cardiac condition was missed by the ED staff. As a Psychiatrist performing a Psychiatric Evaluation, the Mental Health Procedures Act (MPHA) was implicated, increasing the burden of proof for the Psychiatrist to that of actions of willful, wanton, reckless conduct. The Trial Court ruled that the prior Supreme Court Opinion prevented the application of the MPHA in this instance. The burden of proof remained as ordinary negligence as to all defendants. The jury rendered a unanimous defense verdict in approximately 45 minutes. No appeal was filed.

Successfully defended the insurance company after both jury and bench trials brought by various medical providers for thousands of dollars in first party claims denied based on lack of medical necessity, fraud, incomplete/insufficient/improper claims documents and excessive billing.

Secured a defense verdict for two defendant radiologists in a case where they were alleged to have missed the diagnosis of a thoracic aortic aneurysm on the abdominal CT scans that they interpreted 6 and 18 months before plaintiff’s demise. The defense of this case surrounded the fact that a thoracic mid-ascending aortic aneurysm cannot be seen from an abdominal CT scan.

Secured dismissal before trial on behalf of a surgeon who allegedly ligated the plaintiff’s right ureter during surgery resulting in a fistula and the need for repair. This matter also involved allegations that our client did not obtain proper informed consent prior to the surgery.

Secured dismissal on behalf of an orthopedic surgeon who was alleged to have place a wrong-sided hip prosthesis in a Plaintiff during hip replacement.

Obtained dismissal on behalf of a municipal client in a premises liability matter where the plaintiff suffered a spinal compression fracture and concussion.

Represented health care providers in a matter involving the application of the Prison Litigation Reform Act on appeal to the Third Circuit.

Attained a defense verdict for a family practice physician who allegedly delayed diagnosis of prostate cancer in a 65-year-old man with an elevated PSA level. The two-week trial was held in Montgomery county. Plaintiff alleged that, by the time of diagnosis, he had an aggressive Stage IV, metastatic cancer and died before the date of trial.

Attained a defense verdict as the only remaining defendant, representing a Psychiatrist who evaluated a 29-year-old man that was admitted to the Step Down Unit of the hospital with hallucinations, delusions, erratic behavior, and a very high ammonia level when brought to the ER. Six hours after the psychiatric exam, the plaintiff got up from the bed where he was lying with his girlfriend, ran across the hall, and jumped through a 4th story window, landing on the 2nd-floor roof. He survived, but with many injuries. All other parties settled before and during the trial, which took two weeks to complete.

Attained a defense verdict in an almost two-week trial completed in York, PA. The plaintiffs were a married couple that alleged negligence against a Christian counselor who treated the wife at her church as she regained repressed memories related to repeated and profound sexual abuse from the time she was four years old through adulthood.

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby, LLP
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. Read our complete Privacy Policy.